Strange how when I'm in the college cafeteria and hear the students arguing about history or politics or religion, it all seems so childish.
I find no pleasure in discussing ideas any more on such an elementary level.
People resent being shown that they don't approach the complexities of the problem—they don't know what exists beyond the surface ripples.
It's just as bad on a higher level, and I've given up any attempt to discuss these things with the professors at Beekman.
Burt introduced me to an economics professor at the faculty cafeteria, one well known for his work on the economic factors affecting interest rates.
I had long wanted to talk to an economist about some of the ideas I had come across in my reading.
The moral aspects of the military blockade as a weapon in times of peace had been bothering me.
I asked him what he thought of the suggestion by some senators that we begin using such tactics as "blacklisting"
and reinforcement of the navicert controls that had been used in World Wars I and II, against some of the smaller nations which now oppose us.
He listened quietly, staring off into space, and I assumed he was collecting his thoughts for an answer,
but a few minutes later he cleared his throat and shook his head.
That, he explained apologetically, was outside his area of specialization.
전체재생
다음페이지
문장검색